On 9/26/22 8:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 02:52:54PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> For both of these, how about we just simplify like below? I think >> at that point it's useless to name them anyway. > > I think this version is better than the previous one, but I'd still > prefer a non-anonymous union. Sure, I don't really care. What name do you want for it? -- Jens Axboe
