On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:20 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: block/bsg.c > Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:53:54 -0500 > > > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 12:19 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > Since Linus is happily snoring by now, could you test and see if the > > > > > tree works for you? > > > > > > > > It works for me. I'll submit some minor patches against your bsg > > > > branch to scsi-ml. Can you push them together? > > > > > > Certainly, I'll pull them into the bsg branch. > > > > While you're at it, here's a patch to separate BSG and SCSI again (so > > SCSI can be built modular). The way I did it was simply to move the > > SCSI specific logic into SCSI. When you come up with a generic way to > > register the bsg requiring drivers, then we can move it out again. > > Thanks, looks nice. You're welcome ... although there's still a problem for modular builds. This is what my /sys/class/bsg looks like: So you see the if (rq->kobj.parent) is causing confusing naming. The reason the first one shows up as 0:0:0:0 is because in an initrd scsi_mod is loaded first (which is when bsg binds) followed by sd_mod (which is what gives the device the ULD binding and hence the name). I don't see any way around this, so I'd advocate simply using the sdev name rather than the block device name and dumping the if. > > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c > > @@ -714,6 +714,7 @@ static int attr_add(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr) > > int scsi_sysfs_add_sdev(struct scsi_device *sdev) > > { > > int error, i; > > + struct request_queue *rq = sdev->request_queue; > > > > if ((error = scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING)) != 0) > > return error; > > @@ -733,6 +734,16 @@ int scsi_sysfs_add_sdev(struct scsi_device *sdev) > > /* take a reference for the sdev_classdev; this is > > * released by the sdev_class .release */ > > get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev); > > + > > + if (rq->kobj.parent) > > + error = bsg_register_queue(rq, kobject_name(rq->kobj.parent)); > > + else > > + error = bsg_register_queue(rq, kobject_name(&sdev->sdev_gendev.kobj)); > > + if (error) { > > + sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev, "Failed to register bsg queue\n"); > > + goto out; > > Needs more cleanup here? No ... this bit's magic and clever. Once you've set up the devices and done a get_device, cleanup is simply doing a put_device because it's all done in the release routine. > We might just ignore the error here since it's not fatal not to create > a bsg device, I guess. > > I updated the patch against the latest code (which has just be merged > to Linus's tree). Thanks, James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html