On Thu, 8 Sep 2022, 9:55am, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On 9/7/22 16:33, Arun Easi wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/trace.h b/include/linux/trace.h
> > index bf16961..b5e16e4 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/trace.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/trace.h
> > @@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
> > #ifndef _LINUX_TRACE_H
> > #define _LINUX_TRACE_H
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
> > -
> > #define TRACE_EXPORT_FUNCTION BIT(0)
> > #define TRACE_EXPORT_EVENT BIT(1)
> > #define TRACE_EXPORT_MARKER BIT(2)
> > @@ -28,6 +26,8 @@ struct trace_export {
> > int flags;
> > };
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
> > +
> > int register_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export);
> > int unregister_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export);
> > @@ -48,6 +48,38 @@ void osnoise_arch_unregister(void);
> > void osnoise_trace_irq_entry(int id);
> > void osnoise_trace_irq_exit(int id, const char *desc);
> > +#else /* CONFIG_TRACING */
> > +static inline int register_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export)
> > +{
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +static inline int unregister_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +static inline void trace_printk_init_buffers(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +static inline int trace_array_printk(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long
> > ip,
> > + const char *fmt, ...)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +static inline int trace_array_init_printk(struct trace_array *tr)
> > +{
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +static inline void trace_array_put(struct trace_array *tr)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +static inline struct trace_array *trace_array_get_by_name(const char *name)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +static inline int trace_array_destroy(struct trace_array *tr)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > #endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
> > #endif /* _LINUX_TRACE_H */
>
> Thanks for having addressed my feedback. The above looks good to me. However,
> I'm not very familiar with the tracing framework so I will leave it to others
> to formally review this patch.
>
Thanks for the review and suggestion of the clang-format command line,
Bart. That is a useful one to remember.
Steve, does this look ok? If so, your approval is appreciated, as this is
a build blocker fix.
Regards,
-Arun
