Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] tracing: Fix compile error in trace_array calls when TRACING is disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/7/22 11:57, Arun Easi wrote:
+#else	/* CONFIG_TRACING */
+static inline int register_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+static inline int unregister_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export)
+{
+	return 0;
+}

Isn't it recommended to leave a blank line between function definitions?

+static inline int
+trace_array_printk(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long ip,
+		       const char *fmt, ...)

This is not the recommended way to format a function definition. Consider running git clang-format HEAD^.

+static inline struct trace_array *
+trace_array_get_by_name(const char *name)

Same comment here.

Thanks,

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux