On 8/24/2022 12:51 AM, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Return the value from lpfc_issue_reg_vfi() directly instead of storing it
in another redundant variable.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c
index 9be3bb01a8ec..ac0c7ccf2eae 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c
@@ -1977,8 +1977,6 @@ lpfc_sli4_bsg_set_loopback_mode(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int mode,
static int
lpfc_sli4_diag_fcport_reg_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
{
- int rc;
-
if (phba->pport->fc_flag & FC_VFI_REGISTERED) {
lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_WARNING, LOG_LIBDFC,
"3136 Port still had vfi registered: "
@@ -1988,8 +1986,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_diag_fcport_reg_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
phba->vpi_ids[phba->pport->vpi]);
return -EINVAL;
}
- rc = lpfc_issue_reg_vfi(phba->pport);
- return rc;
+ return lpfc_issue_reg_vfi(phba->pport);
}
/**
Thanks
Reviewed-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@xxxxxxxxx>
-- james
