On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 09:38:59AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 17 2007, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > > > > > The Xen and Calgary bits are mutually exclusive, so hopefully (a) > > > > will not be held up on account of the Xen merge (or for any other > > > > reason... CalIOC2 machines which are out there won't boot without > > > > it if CONFIG_CALGARY_IOMMU is enabled). > > > > > > Do you have any comments for the patch to calgary (the mail you are > > > replying to)? > > > > It looks ok, I just didn't want to ACK it before testing (I'm paranoid > > that way). > > That's certainly understandable! Can you mail me an ack once you've had > a chance to test it? Yep, taking it for a spin now. Cheers, Muli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
