Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t
From: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:22:25 -0500
Cc: bvanassche@xxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, james.bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220809071803.GB11161@lst.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.0

On 8/9/22 2:18 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 07:04:15PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> This patch has the sd pr_ops convert from the low level SCSI errors to a
>> blk_status_t.
> 
> Can you document the why here?

Will do. Also will fix up the comments in the other patches.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH 0/20] Use block pr_ops in LIO
  - From: Mike Christie
- [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t
  - From: Mike Christie
- Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 09/20] nvme: Add helper to execute Reservation Report
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 14/20] scsi: Retry pr_ops commands if a UA is returned.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: Have sd pr_ops return a blk_status_t
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 19/20] scsi: target: Don't support SCSI-2 RESERVE/RELEASE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux