>hi Jinyoung,
>
>On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 12:11 PM Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Stanley,
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:29 PM Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Messages are modified to fit the format of others.
>> >>
>> >> Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>
>> >> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jinyoung Choi <j-young.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c | 2 +-
>> >> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
>> >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c
>> >> index 2c0b7f45de4b..117272cf7d61 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c
>> >> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static ssize_t wb_on_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> >> * If the platform supports UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING, turn WB
>> >> * on/off will be done while clock scaling up/down.
>> >> */
>> >> - dev_warn(dev, "To control WB through wb_on is not allowed!\n");
>> >> + dev_warn(dev, "It is not allowed to configure WB!\n");
>> >> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> >> index 5099d161f115..dcd7f03db2a2 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> >> @@ -5737,13 +5737,13 @@ int ufshcd_wb_toggle(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool enable)
>> >>
>> >> ret = __ufshcd_wb_toggle(hba, enable, QUERY_FLAG_IDN_WB_EN);
>> >> if (ret) {
>> >> - dev_err(hba->dev, "%s Write Booster %s failed %d\n",
>> >> - __func__, enable ? "enable" : "disable", ret);
>> >> + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Write Booster %s failed %d\n",
>> >> + __func__, enable ? "enabling" : "disabling", ret);
>> >> return ret;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> hba->dev_info.wb_enabled = enable;
>> >> - dev_info(hba->dev, "%s Write Booster %s\n",
>> >> + dev_info(hba->dev, "%s: Write Booster %s\n",
>> >> __func__, enable ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>> >
>> >You need to rebase this patch to follow the latest change as
>> >https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220709000027.3929970-1-bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>> I am currently working on the latest 5.20/scsi-staging.
>> In this case, can I refer the commit of 5.19/scsi-fixes
>> and add commit to 5.20/scsi-staging?
>> Or can I reflect it in my change?
>> I have no experience, so please guide. :)
>>
>> Thank you for checking.
>> Jinyoung.
>>
>>
>
>I did not notice that the below patch is merged to 5.19/scsi-fixes, so
>I guess perhaps you could keep working on the latest
>5.20/scsi-staging, and then Martin would help resolve the conflict.
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220709000027.3929970-1-bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
>Thanks,
>
>Stanley
It has been applied to 5.19/scsi-fixes,
so I will modify the debug level at my change for sync.
Best Regards,
Jinyoung.
