On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:37 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote: > This code change includes all of the UFSHCD_CAP_* constants in the > kernel ABI. Is that really what we want? I'm wondering whether it > perhaps would be better only to export those capabilities to user space > that user space needs to know about. Adding the filtering would introduce an extra maintenance burden and will likely go out of sync. I don't see harm in exposing all capabilities, both intrinsic to the controller and negotiated with the device. Do you see any scenario where that would be harmful? --Daniil
