On 7/23/22 08:26, Avri Altman wrote:
+ + /* sqen|size|cqid */ + ufsmcq_writel(hba, (1 << 31) | qsize | (i << 16), + MCQ_CFG_n(REG_SQATTR, i));So there is a 1X1 SQ-CQ topology. Isn't that should be configurable?
Hi Avri,I'm in favor of starting with a 1:1 SQ:CQ mapping and only adding support for other approaches if there is a very good reason.
Thanks, Bart.