Re: [PATCH 06/36] target: Return Function Complete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 11:51:38PM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> 
> On 7/7/2022, Dmitry Bogdanov wrote:
> > Hi Thinh,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 04:35:01PM -0700, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> >> According to SAM-4 r14 section 7.2, for ABORT TASK function, a response
> >> of FUNCTION COMPLETE shall indicate that the command was aborted or was
> >> not in the task set. Currently we respond with TASK DOES NOT EXIST when
> >> there's no command in the task set. Fix the response to FUNCTION
> >> COMPLETE instead.
> > SAM does not describe a response status encoding. But other specs
> > do describe. For example, iSCSI RFC7143 11.6.1.  Response
> >         0 - Function complete
> >         1 - Task does not exist
> >     The mapping of the response code into a SCSI service response code
> >     value, if needed, is outside the scope of this document.  However, in
> >     symbolic terms, Response values 0 and 1 map to the SCSI service
> >     response of FUNCTION COMPLETE.
> >
> > So, the current code is according to specs.
> > Moreover, TMR_TASK_DOES_NOT_EXIST is used in several fabric drivers to
> > handle some corner cases.
> 
> Ok, it's a bit confusing. So, the SCSI service response needs to reflect
> FUNCTION COMPLETE, but the FUNCTION COMPLETE can be different for other
> specs?
Yes, SCSI service response code may have a different values to differentiate
a level of "success" :) or a reason of failure.
> 
> Thanks,
> Thinh
> 
> >> Fixes: 3d28934aaae5 ("target: Add TMR_ABORT_TASK task management support")
> >> Signed-off-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c | 4 ++--
> >>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
> >> index 2af80d0998bf..724ddabda488 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tmr.c
> >> @@ -170,9 +170,9 @@ void core_tmr_abort_task(
> >>      if (dev->transport->tmr_notify)
> >>              dev->transport->tmr_notify(dev, TMR_ABORT_TASK, &aborted_list);
> >>
> >> -    printk("ABORT_TASK: Sending TMR_TASK_DOES_NOT_EXIST for ref_tag: %lld\n",
> >> +    printk("ABORT_TASK: Sending TMR_FUNCTION_COMPLETE for ref_tag: %lld\n",
> >>                      tmr->ref_task_tag);
> >> -    tmr->response = TMR_TASK_DOES_NOT_EXIST;
> >> +    tmr->response = TMR_FUNCTION_COMPLETE;
> >>      atomic_long_inc(&dev->aborts_no_task);
> >>   }
> >>
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux