Hi Martin, On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 04:42:36PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Christoph, > > > (and I wonder if we have similar problems with other commands, the > > target code could use same targeted fuzzing..) > > Yeah. > > The USB gadget series implements initial support for RSOC. It might be > worth entertaining to augment that code with CDB masks for all the > commands we actually support. And then leverage these masks for command > validation. I have a patchset with complete RSOC support with CDB mask. Even dynamic mask due to device configuration. It passes all RSOC related libiscsi tests. If the community want it I may send it.
