Re: [PATCH 3/3] ufs: ufs-exynos: change ufs phy control sequence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/07/2022 08:54, Chanho Park wrote:
> Since commit 1599069a62c6 ("phy: core: Warn when phy_power_on is called
> before phy_init"), below warning has been reported.
> 
> phy_power_on was called before phy_init
> 
> To address this, we need to remove phy_power_on from
> exynos_ufs_phy_init and move it after phy_init. phy_power_off and
> phy_exit are also necessary in exynos_ufs_remove.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c | 13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c
> index f971569bafc7..5718296e2521 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-exynos.c
> @@ -908,6 +908,8 @@ static int exynos_ufs_phy_init(struct exynos_ufs *ufs)
>  		goto out_exit_phy;
>  	}
>  
> +	phy_power_on(generic_phy);


What about phy_power_on() return code?

> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_exit_phy:
> @@ -1169,10 +1171,6 @@ static int exynos_ufs_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = phy_power_on(ufs->phy);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto phy_off;
> -


Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux