RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] arch/*/: remove CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Michael Schmitz
> Sent: 29 June 2022 00:09
> 
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On 29/06/22 09:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 11:03 PM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 28/06/22 19:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>>> The driver allocates bounce buffers using kmalloc if it hits an
> >>>> unaligned data buffer - can such buffers still even happen these days?
> >>> No idea.
> >> Hmmm - I think I'll stick a WARN_ONCE() in there so we know whether this
> >> code path is still being used.
> > kmalloc() guarantees alignment to the next power-of-two size or
> > KMALLOC_MIN_ALIGN, whichever is bigger. On m68k this means it
> > is cacheline aligned.
> 
> And all SCSI buffers are allocated using kmalloc? No way at all for user
> space to pass unaligned data?

I didn't think kmalloc() gave any such guarantee about alignment.
There are cache-line alignment requirements on systems with non-coherent
dma, but otherwise the alignment can be much smaller.

One of the allocators adds a header to each item, IIRC that can
lead to 'unexpected' alignments - especially on m68k.

dma_alloc_coherent() does align to next 'power of 2'.
And sometimes you need (eg) 16k allocates that are 16k aligned.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux