there is an unexpected word "the" in the comments that need to be dropped
file: drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
line: 208
* age_fcfs are protected by the the fcoe_ctlr's mutex.
changed to:
* age_fcfs are protected by the fcoe_ctlr's mutex.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Jian <jiangjian@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
index 39e16eab47aa..28e8b9f1e1a4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static int fcoe_sysfs_fcf_add(struct fcoe_fcf *new)
* that doesn't have a priv (fcf was deleted). However,
* libfcoe will always delete FCFs before trying to add
* them. This is ensured because both recv_adv and
- * age_fcfs are protected by the the fcoe_ctlr's mutex.
+ * age_fcfs are protected by the fcoe_ctlr's mutex.
* This means that we should never get a FCF with a
* non-NULL priv pointer.
*/
--
2.17.1
