On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 22:02 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Martin,
>
> > @@ -1531,9 +1536,10 @@ static int scsi_report_lun_scan(struct
> > scsi_target *starget, blist_flags_t bflag
> > " allowed by the host
> > adapter\n", lun);
> > } else {
> > int res;
> > + blist_flags_t bflags = BLIST_RETRY_SCAN;
>
> I'm not a big fan of using the bflag as carrier of "I was reported
> and
> therefore must exist".
>
> Also: Why isn't patch #2 sufficient?
I think it is. I can resubmit just #2 if you prefer and Hannes agrees.
Regards,
Martin
