Thanks Michael for review, please find my comments inline
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 02:49:09AM +0000, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> From: Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2022 9:37 AM
> >
> > CC : linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 09:33:44AM -0700, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
> > > This patch corrects 3 parameters:
> > > 1. Correct the sysfs entry for maximum hardware transfer limit of single
> > > transfer (max_hw_sectors_kb) by setting max_sectors, this was set to
> > > default value 512kb before.
> > > 2. Correct SGL memory offset alignment as per Hyper-V page size.
> > > 3. Correct sg_tablesize which accounts for max SGL segments entries in a
> > > single SGL.
>
> I think a richer explanation in the commit message is warranted.
> Something like:
>
> Current code is based on the idea that the max number of SGL entries also
> determines the max size of an I/O request. While this idea was true in older
> versions of the storvsc driver when SGL entry length was limited to 4 Kbytes,
> commit 3d9c3dcc58e9 ("scsi: storvsc: Enable scatter list entry lengths > 4Kbytes")
> removed that limitation. It's now theoretically possible for the block
> layer to send requests that exceed the maximum size supported by Hyper-V.
> This problem doesn't currently happen in practice because the block layer
> defaults to a 512 Kbyte maximum, while Hyper-V in Azure supports 2 Mbyte
> I/O sizes. But some future configuration of Hyper-V could have a smaller
> max I/O size, and the block layer could exceed that max.
>
> Fix this by correctly setting max_sectors as well as sg_tablesize to reflect
> the maximum I/O size that Hyper-V reports. While allowing larger I/O sizes
> larger than the block layer default of 512 Kbytes doesn't provide any
> noticeable performance benefit in the tests we ran, it's still appropriate
> to report the correct underlying Hyper-V capabilities to the Linux block layer.
>
> Also tweak the virt_boundary_mask to reflect that the needed alignment
> derives from Hyper-V communication using a 4 Kbyte page size, and not
> on the guest page size, which might be bigger (on ARM64, for example).
>
> I don't think the title of the commit should focus on sysfs. This
> commit is about correctly reporting Hyper-V I/O size limits; the sysfs
> entries just provide visibility into the values.
>
> And given that the problem was introduced by the above mentioned
> commit, it would be appropriate to add a "Fixes:" tag.
[SS] : Thanks, will fix this
>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> > > index ca3530982e52..3e032660ae36 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
> > > @@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template scsi_driver = {
> > > .cmd_per_lun = 2048,
> > > .this_id = -1,
> > > /* Ensure there are no gaps in presented sgls */
> > > - .virt_boundary_mask = PAGE_SIZE-1,
> > > + .virt_boundary_mask = HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE - 1,
> > > .no_write_same = 1,
> > > .track_queue_depth = 1,
> > > .change_queue_depth = storvsc_change_queue_depth,
> > > @@ -1969,11 +1969,31 @@ static int storvsc_probe(struct hv_device *device,
> > > /* max cmd length */
> > > host->max_cmd_len = STORVSC_MAX_CMD_LEN;
> > >
> > > + /* max_hw_sectors_kb */
> > > + host->max_sectors = (stor_device->max_transfer_bytes) >> 9;
> > > /*
> > > - * set the table size based on the info we got
> > > - * from the host.
> > > + * There are 2 requirements for Hyper-V storvsc sgl segments,
> > > + * based on which the below calculation for max segments is
> > > + * done:
> > > + *
> > > + * 1. Except for the first and last sgl segment, all sgl segments
> > > + * should be align to HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, that also means the
> > > + * maximum number of segments in a sgl can be calculated by
> > > + * dividing the total max transfer length by HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE.
> > > + *
> > > + * 2. Except for the first and last, each entry in the SGL must
> > > + * have an offset that is a multiple of HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE,
> > > + * whereas the complete length of transfer may not be aligned
> > > + * to HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE always. This can result in 2 cases:
> > > + * Example for unaligned case: Let's say the total transfer
> > > + * length is 6 KB, the max segments will be 3 (1,4,1).
> > > + * Example for aligned case: Let's say the total transfer length
> > > + * is 8KB, then max segments will still be 3(2,4,2) and not 4.
> > > + * 4 (read next higher value) segments will only be required
> > > + * once the length is at least 2 bytes more then 8KB (read any
> > > + * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE aligned length).
> > > */
> > > - host->sg_tablesize = (stor_device->max_transfer_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > + host->sg_tablesize = ((stor_device->max_transfer_bytes - 2) >> HV_HYP_PAGE_SHIFT) + 2;
>
> This calculation covers all possible I/O request sizes up to and including
> the value of max_transfer_bytes, even if max_transfer_bytes is some
> weird number that's not a multiple of 512. So I think it works as
> intended.
>
> But setting host->max_sectors means that storvsc won't see an I/O request
> with a weird size, and some of the cases handled by the calculation don't
> actually occur. You could use a simpler calculation that's a bit easier to
> understand:
>
> host->sg_tablesize = (stor_device->max_transfer_bytes >> HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE) + 1;
>
> The "+1" handles the unaligned case you mention above.
[SS] : As per my understanding this may give incorrect result for unaligned cases. Lets take an
example of 6KB, "stor_device->max_transfer_bytes >> HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE" will give only 1, and then
host->sq_tablesize will get final value as 2. Where as there is a possibility of 3 segments
1. 1KB
2. 4KB
3. 1KB
Please correct me if this scenario is not possible.
- Saurabh
>
> Michael
>
> > > /*
> > > * For non-IDE disks, the host supports multiple channels.
> > > * Set the number of HW queues we are supporting.
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
