In pm8001_tag_alloc() we don't require atomic set_bit() as we are already in atomic context. In pm8001_tag_free() we should use the same host spinlock to protect clearing the tag (and then don't require the atomic clear_bit()). Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c index 3a863d776724..8e3f2f9ddaac 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c @@ -66,7 +66,11 @@ static int pm8001_find_tag(struct sas_task *task, u32 *tag) void pm8001_tag_free(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 tag) { void *bitmap = pm8001_ha->tags; - clear_bit(tag, bitmap); + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags); + __clear_bit(tag, bitmap); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags); } /** @@ -76,9 +80,9 @@ void pm8001_tag_free(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 tag) */ int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out) { - unsigned int tag; void *bitmap = pm8001_ha->tags; unsigned long flags; + unsigned int tag; spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags); tag = find_first_zero_bit(bitmap, pm8001_ha->tags_num); @@ -86,7 +90,7 @@ int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags); return -SAS_QUEUE_FULL; } - set_bit(tag, bitmap); + __set_bit(tag, bitmap); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm8001_ha->bitmap_lock, flags); *tag_out = tag; return 0; -- 2.26.2