Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: libsas: introduce struct smp_disc_resp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/06/2022 12:59, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On 6/9/22 17:43, John Garry wrote:
   #define DISCOVER_REQ_SIZE  16
-#define DISCOVER_RESP_SIZE 56
+#define DISCOVER_RESP_SIZE sizeof(struct smp_disc_resp)
I feel that it would be nice to get rid of these.

Maybe something like:

#define smp_execute_task_wrap(dev, req, resp)\
smp_execute_task(dev, req, sizeof(*req), resp, DISCOVER_REQ_SIZE)


static int sas_ex_phy_discover_helper(struct domain_device *dev, u8
*disc_req, struct smp_disc_resp *disc_resp, int single)
{
	res = smp_execute_task_wrap(dev, disc_req, disc_resp);

We could even introduce a smp req struct to get rid of DISCOVER_REQ_SIZE
- the (current) code would be a bit less cryptic then.
Yes, I think the req size needs a similar treatment too, and we can remove
all these REQ/RESP_SIZE macros. But for now, the req side does not bother
gcc and I do not see any warning, so I left it. This series is really
about getting rid of the warnings so that we can use CONFIG_WERROR.
There are some xfs warnings that needs to be taken care of too to be able
to use that one again though.

But no big deal. Looks ok apart from that.
If you agree to do the req cleanup as a followup series,

ok, I'll assume that you can do it when you get a chance..

can you send a
formal review please ?

Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux