Re: [PATCH 4/4] libata-scsi: Cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/20/22 17:23, John Garry wrote:
> ATA devices (struct ata_device) have a max_sectors field which is
> configured internally in libata. This is then used to (re)configure the
> associated sdev request queue max_sectors value from how it is earlier set
> in __scsi_init_queue(). In __scsi_init_queue() the max_sectors value is set
> according to shost limits, which includes host DMA mapping limits.
> 
> Cap the ata_device max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors to respect
> this shost limit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 06c9d90238d9..25fe89791641 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -1036,6 +1036,7 @@ int ata_scsi_dev_config(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct ata_device *dev)
>  		dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_NO_UNLOAD;
>  
>  	/* configure max sectors */
> +	dev->max_sectors = min(dev->max_sectors, sdev->host->max_sectors);
>  	blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, dev->max_sectors);
>  
>  	if (dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI) {

Acked-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux