Re: [PATCH 10/11] fas216: Rework device reset to not rely on SCSI command pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] fas216: Rework device reset to not rely on SCSI command pointer
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 16:33:25 +0200
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, James Bottomley <james.bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220502215416.5351-11-hare@suse.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Eww, the function pointer abuse in this drive is rather gross.

But the changes looks ok to me:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH 00/11] scsi: EH rework prep patches, part 2
  - From: Hannes Reinecke
- [PATCH 10/11] fas216: Rework device reset to not rely on SCSI command pointer
  - From: Hannes Reinecke

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/11] bfa: Do not use scsi command to signal TMF status
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 11/11] csiostor: use separate TMF command
Previous by thread: [PATCH 10/11] fas216: Rework device reset to not rely on SCSI command pointer
Next by thread: [PATCH 06/11] bfa: Do not use scsi command to signal TMF status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux