> > Move a check related to clock scaling into ufshcd_devfreq_scale(). This > patch prepares for adding a second ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare() > caller. A caller for ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare() in which clk_scaling is not allowed ? Thanks, Avri > > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index a3fecbb403d3..3c83f4049031 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -1223,8 +1223,7 @@ static int ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare(struct > ufs_hba *hba) > ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba); > down_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock); > > - if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed || > - ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(hba, DOORBELL_CLR_TOUT_US)) { > + if (ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(hba, DOORBELL_CLR_TOUT_US)) { > ret = -EBUSY; > up_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock); > ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba); > @@ -1262,10 +1261,18 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba > *hba, bool scale_up) > int ret = 0; > bool is_writelock = true; > > + if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed) > + return -EBUSY; > + > ret = ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare(hba); > if (ret) > return ret; > > + if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed) { > + ret = -EBUSY; > + goto out_unprepare; > + } > + > /* scale down the gear before scaling down clocks */ > if (!scale_up) { > ret = ufshcd_scale_gear(hba, false);