On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:59:01AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 4/26/22 19:12, Nitesh Shetty wrote: > > Add device limits as sysfs entries, > > - copy_offload (RW) > > - copy_max_bytes (RW) > > - copy_max_hw_bytes (RO) > > - copy_max_range_bytes (RW) > > - copy_max_range_hw_bytes (RO) > > - copy_max_nr_ranges (RW) > > - copy_max_nr_ranges_hw (RO) > > > > Above limits help to split the copy payload in block layer. > > copy_offload, used for setting copy offload(1) or emulation(0). > > copy_max_bytes: maximum total length of copy in single payload. > > copy_max_range_bytes: maximum length in a single entry. > > copy_max_nr_ranges: maximum number of entries in a payload. > > copy_max_*_hw_*: Reflects the device supported maximum limits. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Arnav Dawn <arnav.dawn@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block | 83 ++++++++++++++++ > > block/blk-settings.c | 59 ++++++++++++ > > block/blk-sysfs.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/blkdev.h | 13 +++ > > 4 files changed, 293 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block > > index e8797cd09aff..65e64b5a0105 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block > > @@ -155,6 +155,89 @@ Description: > > last zone of the device which may be smaller. > > > > > > +What: /sys/block/<disk>/queue/copy_offload > > +Date: April 2022 > > +Contact: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +Description: > > + [RW] When read, this file shows whether offloading copy to > > + device is enabled (1) or disabled (0). Writing '0' to this > > + file will disable offloading copies for this device. > > + Writing any '1' value will enable this feature. > > + > > + > > +What: /sys/block/<disk>/queue/copy_max_bytes > > +Date: April 2022 > > +Contact: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +Description: > > + [RW] While 'copy_max_hw_bytes' is the hardware limit for the > > + device, 'copy_max_bytes' setting is the software limit. > > + Setting this value lower will make Linux issue smaller size > > + copies. > > + > > + > > +What: /sys/block/<disk>/queue/copy_max_hw_bytes > > +Date: April 2022 > > +Contact: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +Description: > > + [RO] Devices that support offloading copy functionality may have > > + internal limits on the number of bytes that can be offloaded > > + in a single operation. The `copy_max_hw_bytes` > > + parameter is set by the device driver to the maximum number of > > + bytes that can be copied in a single operation. Copy > > + requests issued to the device must not exceed this limit. > > + A value of 0 means that the device does not > > + support copy offload. > > + > > + > > +What: /sys/block/<disk>/queue/copy_max_nr_ranges > > +Date: April 2022 > > +Contact: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +Description: > > + [RW] While 'copy_max_nr_ranges_hw' is the hardware limit for the > > + device, 'copy_max_nr_ranges' setting is the software limit. > > + > > + > > +What: /sys/block/<disk>/queue/copy_max_nr_ranges_hw > > +Date: April 2022 > > +Contact: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +Description: > > + [RO] Devices that support offloading copy functionality may have > > + internal limits on the number of ranges in single copy operation > > + that can be offloaded in a single operation. > > + A range is tuple of source, destination and length of data > > + to be copied. The `copy_max_nr_ranges_hw` parameter is set by > > + the device driver to the maximum number of ranges that can be > > + copied in a single operation. Copy requests issued to the device > > + must not exceed this limit. A value of 0 means that the device > > + does not support copy offload. > > + > > + > > +What: /sys/block/<disk>/queue/copy_max_range_bytes > > +Date: April 2022 > > +Contact: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +Description: > > + [RW] While 'copy_max_range_hw_bytes' is the hardware limit for > > + the device, 'copy_max_range_bytes' setting is the software > > + limit. > > + > > + > > +What: /sys/block/<disk>/queue/copy_max_range_hw_bytes > > +Date: April 2022 > > +Contact: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > +Description: > > + [RO] Devices that support offloading copy functionality may have > > + internal limits on the size of data, that can be copied in a > > + single range within a single copy operation. > > + A range is tuple of source, destination and length of data to be > > + copied. The `copy_max_range_hw_bytes` parameter is set by the > > + device driver to set the maximum length in bytes of a range > > + that can be copied in an operation. > > + Copy requests issued to the device must not exceed this limit. > > + Sum of sizes of all ranges in a single opeartion should not > > + exceed 'copy_max_hw_bytes'. A value of 0 means that the device > > + does not support copy offload. > > + > > + > > What: /sys/block/<disk>/queue/crypto/ > > Date: February 2022 > > Contact: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c > > index 6ccceb421ed2..70167aee3bf7 100644 > > --- a/block/blk-settings.c > > +++ b/block/blk-settings.c > > @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ void blk_set_default_limits(struct queue_limits *lim) > > lim->misaligned = 0; > > lim->zoned = BLK_ZONED_NONE; > > lim->zone_write_granularity = 0; > > + lim->max_hw_copy_sectors = 0; > > For readability, I would keep "hw" next to sectors/nr_ranges: > > max_copy_hw_sectors > max_copy_sectors > max_copy_hw_nr_ranges > max_copy_nr_ranges > max_copy_range_hw_sectors > max_copy_range_sectors > acked > > + lim->max_copy_sectors = 0; > > + lim->max_hw_copy_nr_ranges = 0; > > + lim->max_copy_nr_ranges = 0; > > + lim->max_hw_copy_range_sectors = 0; > > + lim->max_copy_range_sectors = 0; > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_default_limits); > > > > @@ -81,6 +87,12 @@ void blk_set_stacking_limits(struct queue_limits *lim) > > lim->max_dev_sectors = UINT_MAX; > > lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = UINT_MAX; > > lim->max_zone_append_sectors = UINT_MAX; > > + lim->max_hw_copy_sectors = ULONG_MAX; > > + lim->max_copy_sectors = ULONG_MAX; > > + lim->max_hw_copy_range_sectors = UINT_MAX; > > + lim->max_copy_range_sectors = UINT_MAX; > > + lim->max_hw_copy_nr_ranges = USHRT_MAX; > > + lim->max_copy_nr_ranges = USHRT_MAX; > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_stacking_limits); > > > > @@ -177,6 +189,45 @@ void blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(struct request_queue *q, > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_discard_sectors); > > > > +/** > > + * blk_queue_max_copy_sectors - set max sectors for a single copy payload > > + * @q: the request queue for the device > > + * @max_copy_sectors: maximum number of sectors to copy > > + **/ > > +void blk_queue_max_copy_sectors(struct request_queue *q, > > This should be blk_queue_max_copy_hw_sectors(). > acked. Reasoning being, this function is used only by driver once for setting hw limits ? > > + unsigned int max_copy_sectors) > > +{ > > + q->limits.max_hw_copy_sectors = max_copy_sectors; > > + q->limits.max_copy_sectors = max_copy_sectors; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_max_copy_sectors); > > + > > +/** > > + * blk_queue_max_copy_range_sectors - set max sectors for a single range, in a copy payload > > + * @q: the request queue for the device > > + * @max_copy_range_sectors: maximum number of sectors to copy in a single range > > + **/ > > +void blk_queue_max_copy_range_sectors(struct request_queue *q, > > And this should be blk_queue_max_copy_range_hw_sectors(). Etc for the > other ones below. > acked > > + unsigned int max_copy_range_sectors) > > +{ > > + q->limits.max_hw_copy_range_sectors = max_copy_range_sectors; > > + q->limits.max_copy_range_sectors = max_copy_range_sectors; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_max_copy_range_sectors); > > + > > +/** > > + * blk_queue_max_copy_nr_ranges - set max number of ranges, in a copy payload > > + * @q: the request queue for the device > > + * @max_copy_nr_ranges: maximum number of ranges > > + **/ > > +void blk_queue_max_copy_nr_ranges(struct request_queue *q, > > + unsigned int max_copy_nr_ranges) > > +{ > > + q->limits.max_hw_copy_nr_ranges = max_copy_nr_ranges; > > + q->limits.max_copy_nr_ranges = max_copy_nr_ranges; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_max_copy_nr_ranges); > > + > > /** > > * blk_queue_max_secure_erase_sectors - set max sectors for a secure erase > > * @q: the request queue for the device > > @@ -572,6 +623,14 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b, > > t->max_segment_size = min_not_zero(t->max_segment_size, > > b->max_segment_size); > > > > + t->max_copy_sectors = min(t->max_copy_sectors, b->max_copy_sectors); > > + t->max_hw_copy_sectors = min(t->max_hw_copy_sectors, b->max_hw_copy_sectors); > > + t->max_copy_range_sectors = min(t->max_copy_range_sectors, b->max_copy_range_sectors); > > + t->max_hw_copy_range_sectors = min(t->max_hw_copy_range_sectors, > > + b->max_hw_copy_range_sectors); > > + t->max_copy_nr_ranges = min(t->max_copy_nr_ranges, b->max_copy_nr_ranges); > > + t->max_hw_copy_nr_ranges = min(t->max_hw_copy_nr_ranges, b->max_hw_copy_nr_ranges); > > + > > t->misaligned |= b->misaligned; > > > > alignment = queue_limit_alignment_offset(b, start); > > diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c > > index 88bd41d4cb59..bae987c10f7f 100644 > > --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c > > +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c > > @@ -212,6 +212,129 @@ static ssize_t queue_discard_zeroes_data_show(struct request_queue *q, char *pag > > return queue_var_show(0, page); > > } > > > > +static ssize_t queue_copy_offload_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page) > > +{ > > + return queue_var_show(blk_queue_copy(q), page); > > +} > > + > > +static ssize_t queue_copy_offload_store(struct request_queue *q, > > + const char *page, size_t count) > > +{ > > + unsigned long copy_offload; > > + ssize_t ret = queue_var_store(©_offload, page, count); > > + > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + if (copy_offload && !q->limits.max_hw_copy_sectors) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (copy_offload) > > + blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_COPY, q); > > + else > > + blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_COPY, q); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static ssize_t queue_copy_max_hw_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page) > > +{ > > + return sprintf(page, "%llu\n", > > + (unsigned long long)q->limits.max_hw_copy_sectors << 9); > > +} > > + > > +static ssize_t queue_copy_max_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page> +{ > > + return sprintf(page, "%llu\n", > > + (unsigned long long)q->limits.max_copy_sectors << 9); > > +} > > + > > +static ssize_t queue_copy_max_store(struct request_queue *q, > > + const char *page, size_t count) > > +{ > > + unsigned long max_copy; > > + ssize_t ret = queue_var_store(&max_copy, page, count); > > + > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + if (max_copy & (queue_logical_block_size(q) - 1)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + max_copy >>= 9; > > + if (max_copy > q->limits.max_hw_copy_sectors) > > + max_copy = q->limits.max_hw_copy_sectors; > > + > > + q->limits.max_copy_sectors = max_copy; > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static ssize_t queue_copy_range_max_hw_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page) > > +{ > > + return sprintf(page, "%llu\n", > > + (unsigned long long)q->limits.max_hw_copy_range_sectors << 9); > > +} > > + > > +static ssize_t queue_copy_range_max_show(struct request_queue *q, > > + char *page) > > +{ > > + return sprintf(page, "%llu\n", > > + (unsigned long long)q->limits.max_copy_range_sectors << 9); > > +} > > + > > +static ssize_t queue_copy_range_max_store(struct request_queue *q, > > + const char *page, size_t count) > > +{ > > + unsigned long max_copy; > > + ssize_t ret = queue_var_store(&max_copy, page, count); > > + > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + if (max_copy & (queue_logical_block_size(q) - 1)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + max_copy >>= 9; > > + if (max_copy > UINT_MAX) > > On 32-bits arch, unsigned long and unsigned int are the same so this test > is useless for these arch. Better have max_copy declared as unsigned long > long. > acked -- Nitesh Shetty