Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:09:31 -0400
Cc: alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>, Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220420090353.2588804-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> (cgel zte's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:03:52 +0000")
Organization: Oracle Corporation

> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
> pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
> actual functional changes.

Applied to 5.19/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] scsi: ufs: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
  - From: cgel . zte

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: fix error check return value of debugfs_create_file()
Next by Date: [PATCH] lpfc: Remove unnecessary null ndlp check in lpfc_sli_prep_wqe()
Previous by thread: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux