On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 06:51:36PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Qcom UFS platforms, the reset control line seems to be optional
> (for SoCs like MSM8996 and probably for others too). The current logic
> tries to mimic the `devm_reset_control_get_optional()` API but it also
> continues the probe if there is an error with the declared reset line in
> DT/ACPI.
>
> In an ideal case, if the reset line is not declared in DT/ACPI, the probe
> should continue. But if there is problem in acquiring the declared reset
> line (like EPROBE_DEFER) it should fail and return the appropriate error
> code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> index 0d2e950d0865..5db0fd922062 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -1002,13 +1002,13 @@ static int ufs_qcom_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> host->hba = hba;
> ufshcd_set_variant(hba, host);
>
> - /* Setup the reset control of HCI */
> - host->core_reset = devm_reset_control_get(hba->dev, "rst");
> + /* Setup the optional reset control of HCI */
> + host->core_reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional(hba->dev, "rst");
> if (IS_ERR(host->core_reset)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(host->core_reset);
> - dev_warn(dev, "Failed to get reset control %d\n", err);
> - host->core_reset = NULL;
> - err = 0;
> + if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get reset control %d\n", err);
Could we use dev_err_probe() here?
Otherwise, looks good to me.
> + goto out_variant_clear;
> }
>
> /* Fire up the reset controller. Failure here is non-fatal. */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
