Re: [Question] SCSI_EH: How does EH guarantee there is no UAF of scsi_cmnd if host reset failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022/4/19 22:56, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 4/19/22 16:28, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>> Hi all, I am wondered how does SCSI EH guarantee there is no UAF of scsi_cmnd
>> if host reset failed. If host reset failed and eh_cmd_q of shost is not empty,
>> these command in eh_cmd_q would be added to done_q in scsi_eh_offline_sdevs()
>> and finished by scsi_eh_flush_done_q(). So these scsi_cmnd and it's related
>> request would be freed.
>>
> Yes.
> 
>> While since host reset failed, we can not guarantee the LLDDs has cleared all
>> references to these commands in eh_cmd_q. Is there any possibility that the
>> LLDDs reference to these commands? If this happened, then a using after free
>> issue would occur.
>>
> If host reset has failed there are _no_ assumptions we can make about commands, and not even about the PCI device itself.
> So in effect, once host_reset failed the system is hosed.
> 
> We _might_ be able to resurrect the system by doing PCI EEH, but not many systems nor drivers implement that.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Hannes
> 
> .

Thanks a lot for your reply. I am writing single LUN reset EH flow which discussed in previous mail
and testing it, if the test result is good I would post it.

By the way, you said you would make EH rework, are you doing it? Could you tell us your plan
if it's not secret.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux