Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] scsi: fix scsi_cmd::cmd_len

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Douglas,

>> What exact regression causes this for real users and no just people
>> playing around with scsi_debug?
>
> Sorry, you are regressing something that has been in place for over 20
> years and required by SPC (1 through 5) standards.  The onus should
> not be on me to prove that regression is not safe. It should be the
> other way around (i.e. for you to prove that it is safe).

Christoph's question is valid: Ignoring obsolete command sets that we no
longer support, what is the real world use case for variable length CDBs
larger than 32 bytes? Which devices require them, and do we want to
support those devices?

That fact that a SCSI spec permits something is not the same as saying
we must support it. "Required by SPC" is news to me.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux