Luben Tuikov wrote:
> Indeed it is more accurate to represent LUNs in 64 bit format.
>
> It is even more accurate to represent them as u8 LUN[8], and possibly
> print them as
> "0x%016llx" ((unsigned long long) be64_to_cpu(*(__be64 *)(LUN))).
Might need a little precaution on some architectures.
--- a/include/scsi/scsi.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi.h
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ struct ccs_modesel_head {
*/
struct scsi_lun {
__u8 scsi_lun[8];
-};
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
/*
* MESSAGE CODES
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -==- ==-=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
