James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A proposal to display the correct form of the LUN would be useful if you > wish to make it? ... The problem is really that SAM specifies a > possible 4 level structure with 4 possible address methods per level. > > The well known LUNs should be simple; there are only three: Report Lun, > Access Controls and Target Log Pages. The rest we really need input on. > For instance, I could see the vendors wishing us to combine a > multi-level flat addressing space into a single logical unit number, > whereas I could see them wanting us to supply some sort of hierarchy for > the peripheral and logical unit methods of addressing. > > Since you're already using 2 level flat addressing, how do you want to > see that represented? James, why would we would not want to display the lun per SAM4 4.6.2 as suggested by Stefan in a previous comment. -andmike -- Michael Anderson andmike@xxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
