Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 00:17 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:44 PM Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Others might argue that they should always be changed from,
> > 
> > /*
> >  * this style
> >  * of multiline comment
> >  */
> > 
> > to
> > 
> > /* this style
> >  * of multiline comment
> >  */
> 
> In general, for things that the coding style guide talks about, we
> should follow them, even if some subsystems do not (they can always
> override in their folder if they really, really want it). So, here for
> instance, the first one should be used.

It's up to individual maintainers to each decide on what might be
considered unnecessary churn for the subsystems they control.

One argument is that churn leads to difficulty in backporting
fixes to older 'stable' versions.

I think the churn argument is overstated.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux