Re: [PATCH v2] target: add iscsi/cpus_allowed_list in configfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/17/22 1:45 AM, mingzhe.zou@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The RX/TX threads for iSCSI connection can be scheduled to
> any online cpus, and will not be rescheduled.
> 
> If bind other heavy load threads with iSCSI connection
> RX/TX thread to the same cpu, the iSCSI performance will
> be worse.
> 
> This patch add iscsi/cpus_allowed_list in configfs. The
> available cpus set of iSCSI connection RX/TX threads is
> allowed_cpus & online_cpus. If it is modified, all RX/TX
> threads will be rescheduled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c          | 66 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_configfs.c | 32 ++++++++++
>  drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c    |  8 +++
>  include/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_core.h     | 31 ++-------
>  4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c
> index 2c54c5d8412d..82f54b59996d 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c
> @@ -702,13 +702,19 @@ static int __init iscsi_target_init_module(void)
>  	if (!iscsit_global->ts_bitmap)
>  		goto configfs_out;
>  
> +	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&iscsit_global->allowed_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +		pr_err("Unable to allocate iscsit_global->allowed_cpumask\n");
> +		goto bitmap_out;
> +	}
> +	cpumask_setall(iscsit_global->allowed_cpumask);
> +
>  	lio_qr_cache = kmem_cache_create("lio_qr_cache",
>  			sizeof(struct iscsi_queue_req),
>  			__alignof__(struct iscsi_queue_req), 0, NULL);
>  	if (!lio_qr_cache) {
>  		pr_err("Unable to kmem_cache_create() for"
>  				" lio_qr_cache\n");
> -		goto bitmap_out;
> +		goto cpumask_out;
>  	}
>  
>  	lio_dr_cache = kmem_cache_create("lio_dr_cache",
> @@ -753,6 +759,8 @@ static int __init iscsi_target_init_module(void)
>  	kmem_cache_destroy(lio_dr_cache);
>  qr_out:
>  	kmem_cache_destroy(lio_qr_cache);
> +cpumask_out:
> +	free_cpumask_var(iscsit_global->allowed_cpumask);
>  bitmap_out:
>  	vfree(iscsit_global->ts_bitmap);
>  configfs_out:
> @@ -782,6 +790,7 @@ static void __exit iscsi_target_cleanup_module(void)
>  
>  	target_unregister_template(&iscsi_ops);
>  
> +	free_cpumask_var(iscsit_global->allowed_cpumask);
>  	vfree(iscsit_global->ts_bitmap);
>  	kfree(iscsit_global);
>  }
> @@ -3587,6 +3596,11 @@ static int iscsit_send_reject(
>  void iscsit_thread_get_cpumask(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
>  {
>  	int ord, cpu;
> +	cpumask_t conn_allowed_cpumask;
> +
> +	cpumask_and(&conn_allowed_cpumask, iscsit_global->allowed_cpumask,
> +		    cpu_online_mask);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * bitmap_id is assigned from iscsit_global->ts_bitmap from
>  	 * within iscsit_start_kthreads()
> @@ -3595,8 +3609,9 @@ void iscsit_thread_get_cpumask(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
>  	 * iSCSI connection's RX/TX threads will be scheduled to
>  	 * execute upon.
>  	 */
> -	ord = conn->bitmap_id % cpumask_weight(cpu_online_mask);
> -	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> +	cpumask_clear(conn->conn_cpumask);
> +	ord = conn->bitmap_id % cpumask_weight(&conn_allowed_cpumask);
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, &conn_allowed_cpumask) {
>  		if (ord-- == 0) {
>  			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, conn->conn_cpumask);
>  			return;
> @@ -3609,6 +3624,51 @@ void iscsit_thread_get_cpumask(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
>  	cpumask_setall(conn->conn_cpumask);
>  }
>  
> +static void iscsit_thread_reschedule(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * If iscsit_global->allowed_cpumask modified, reschedule iSCSI
> +	 * connection's RX/TX threads update conn->allowed_cpumask.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cpumask_equal(iscsit_global->allowed_cpumask,
> +			   conn->allowed_cpumask)) {
> +		iscsit_thread_get_cpumask(conn);
> +		conn->conn_tx_reset_cpumask = 1;
> +		conn->conn_rx_reset_cpumask = 1;
> +		cpumask_copy(conn->allowed_cpumask,
> +			     iscsit_global->allowed_cpumask);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void iscsit_thread_check_cpumask(
> +	struct iscsi_conn *conn,
> +	struct task_struct *p,
> +	int mode)
> +{
> +	iscsit_thread_reschedule(conn);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * mode == 1 signals iscsi_target_tx_thread() usage.
> +	 * mode == 0 signals iscsi_target_rx_thread() usage.
> +	 */
> +	if (mode == 1) {
> +		if (!conn->conn_tx_reset_cpumask)
> +			return;
> +		conn->conn_tx_reset_cpumask = 0;
> +	} else {
> +		if (!conn->conn_rx_reset_cpumask)
> +			return;
> +		conn->conn_rx_reset_cpumask = 0;
> +	}
> +	/*
> +	 * Update the CPU mask for this single kthread so that
> +	 * both TX and RX kthreads are scheduled to run on the
> +	 * same CPU.
> +	 */
> +	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(p, conn->conn_cpumask);
> +}

We can hit a race where we call this twice for the same CPU right?

The rx and tx thread both call iscsit_thread_reschedule and cpumask_equal
and it returns false for them. The rx thread might be faster and return
from iscsit_thread_reschedule and is setting conn_rx_reset_cpumask to 0.
Then the tx thread is sets it back to 1. The next time the rx thread loops
it sees conn_rx_reset_cpumask set to 1 and calls set_cpus_allowed_ptr.

Is that the only possible race? If so it seems ok. Maybe just add a comment,
so later when someone else is looking at the code they don't waste time
and think it's broken and know it was intentional or at least we didn't care.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux