Re: remove REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 08:07:56PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Let's just use the SCSI tree - I didn't check if it throws any conflicts
> right now, so probably something to check upfront...

There is a minor conflict because the __blkdev_issue_write_same
function removed by this series is affected by the blk_next_bio calling
convention change in the block tree, but the fixup is trivial.

Martin: do you want to fix that up when applying, or do you want me
to resend?  If you have your discard rework ready you can also send
that now and I'll rebase on top of that.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux