Re: [PATCH REPOST] irq_poll: Add local_bh_disable() in cpu_dead notifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 01:33:39PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> You need to handle the pending softirqs. If you don't handle them
> immediately or in a deterministic say (like on IRQ exit) then they will
> be handled at a random point.

Yes.  Just like regular interrupts.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux