Re: [PATCH 16/20] scsi: pm8001: simplify pm8001_get_ncq_tag()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/02/2022 11:42, Damien Le Moal wrote:
To detect if a command is NCQ, there is no need to test all possible NCQ
command codes. Instead, use ata_is_ncq() to test the command protocol.


task->ata_task.use_ncq holds ata_is_ncq() and that is checked before calling pm8001_get_ncq_tag() in both callsites, so I doubt the point in the caller pre-check, so maybe that can be removed

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
  drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c | 14 +++++---------
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
index 6805c7f43e41..711eaf81f546 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
@@ -306,16 +306,12 @@ static int pm8001_task_prep_smp(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
  u32 pm8001_get_ncq_tag(struct sas_task *task, u32 *tag)
  {
  	struct ata_queued_cmd *qc = task->uldd_task;
-	if (qc) {
-		if (qc->tf.command == ATA_CMD_FPDMA_WRITE ||
-		    qc->tf.command == ATA_CMD_FPDMA_READ ||
-		    qc->tf.command == ATA_CMD_FPDMA_RECV ||
-		    qc->tf.command == ATA_CMD_FPDMA_SEND ||
-		    qc->tf.command == ATA_CMD_NCQ_NON_DATA) {
-			*tag = qc->tag;
-			return 1;
-		}
+
+	if (qc && ata_is_ncq(qc->tf.protocol)) {
+		*tag = qc->tag;
+		return 1;
  	}
+
  	return 0;
  }




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux