On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 05:15:34PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:06:33AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 06:01:13AM +0000, Adam Manzanares wrote: > > > BTW I think having the target code be able to implement simple copy without > > > moving data over the fabric would be a great way of showing off the command. > > > > Do you mean this should be implemented instead as a fabrics backend > > instead because fabrics already instantiates and creates a virtual > > nvme device? And so this would mean less code? > > It would be a lot less code. In fact I don't think we need any new code > at all. Just using nvme-loop on top of null_blk or brd should be all > that is needed. Mikulas, That begs the question why add this instead of using null_blk with nvme-loop? Luis
