Re: [PATCH 32/44] nsp32: Stop using the SCSI pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/30/22 18:53, Masanori Goto wrote:
This is my style, but I prefer retaining DID_OK, even though it's 0 -
to make sure we fill the right field.  Could you retain the DID_OK <<
16 part?

Hi Masanori,

I will restore "(DID_OK << 16) |". Thanks for having taken a look at this patch.

Bart.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux