Re: Samsung t5 / t3 problem with ncq trim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Martin

It seams, that those 2 ssds do not like ncq trim
In the mail i sent to linux-ide I included 4 lines of code for the
ata_device_blacklist in libata-core.c, but since Damien Le Moal
suggested to me to
write it to the maintainer of uas.c I didn't include those 4 lines...
(ht thinks, that i could be because of the usb-adapter on those ssds)
Those line where:

{ "Samsung Portable SSD T5",    NULL,   ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
                                        ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM, },
{ "Samsung Portable SSD T3",    NULL,   ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
                                        ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM, },

But because this seams not to work, i can just say, that those ssds
are suicidal, probably because of ncq trim.
I hope, that this helps you to understand, what the problem is...

Best regards

Sven Hugi

Am Mi., 19. Jan. 2022 um 04:20 Uhr schrieb Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> Sven,
>
> > So, it seams, that there is a problem with the samsung t5 and t3,
>
> What, specifically, is the problem?
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen      Oracle Linux Engineering



-- 
Sven Hugi

github.com/ExtraTNT



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux