Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/csiostor: do not sleep with a spin lock held

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/csiostor: do not sleep with a spin lock held
From: cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:57:54 +0000
Cc: cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx, chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, zealci@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f68657d6-027c-c842-ce35-5524cd782c7e@opensource.wdc.com>

The might_sleep_if(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) in the 
mempool_alloc function uses __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/csiostor: do not sleep with a spin lock held
  - From: Damien Le Moal

References:
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/csiostor: do not sleep with a spin lock held
  - From: Damien Le Moal

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/csiostor: do not sleep with a spin lock held
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/csiostor: do not sleep with a spin lock held
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/csiostor: do not sleep with a spin lock held
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/csiostor: do not sleep with a spin lock held
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux