Re: [PATCH v4 16/17] scsi: ufs: Optimize the command queueing code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/6/2021 2:41 PM, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote:
On 12/3/2021 3:19 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Remove the clock scaling lock from ufshcd_queuecommand() since it is a
performance bottleneck. Instead check the SCSI device budget bitmaps in
the code that waits for ongoing ufshcd_queuecommand() calls. A bit is
set in sdev->budget_map just before scsi_queue_rq() is called and a bit
is cleared from that bitmap if scsi_queue_rq() does not submit the
request or after the request has finished. See also the
blk_mq_{get,put}_dispatch_budget() calls in the block layer.

There is no risk for a livelock since the block layer delays queue
reruns if queueing a request fails because the SCSI host has been
blocked.

Cc: Asutosh Das (asd) <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
---

Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Replying to my own mail.

Hi Bart,
  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h |  1 +
  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 9f0a1f637030..650dddf960c2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1070,13 +1070,31 @@ static bool ufshcd_is_devfreq_scaling_required(struct ufs_hba *hba,
      return false;
  }
+/*
+ * Determine the number of pending commands by counting the bits in the SCSI + * device budget maps. This approach has been selected because a bit is set in + * the budget map before scsi_host_queue_ready() checks the host_self_blocked
+ * flag. The host_self_blocked flag can be modified by calling
+ * scsi_block_requests() or scsi_unblock_requests().
+ */
+static u32 ufshcd_pending_cmds(struct ufs_hba *hba)
+{
+    struct scsi_device *sdev;
+    u32 pending = 0;
+
+    shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
+        pending += sbitmap_weight(&sdev->budget_map);
+
I was porting this change to my downstream code and it occurred to me that in a high IO rate scenario it's possible that bits in the budget_map may be set even when that particular IO may not be issued to driver. So there would unnecessary waiting for that to be cleared.
Do you think it's possible?
I think we should wait only for requests which are already started.
e.g. blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() ?

PLMK your thoughts on this.

+    return pending;
+}
+
  static int ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(struct ufs_hba *hba,
                      u64 wait_timeout_us)
  {
      unsigned long flags;
      int ret = 0;
      u32 tm_doorbell;
-    u32 tr_doorbell;
+    u32 tr_pending;
      bool timeout = false, do_last_check = false;
      ktime_t start;
@@ -1094,8 +1112,8 @@ static int ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(struct ufs_hba *hba,
          }
          tm_doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
-        tr_doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
-        if (!tm_doorbell && !tr_doorbell) {
+        tr_pending = ufshcd_pending_cmds(hba);
+        if (!tm_doorbell && !tr_pending) {
              timeout = false;
              break;
          } else if (do_last_check) {
@@ -1115,12 +1133,12 @@ static int ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(struct ufs_hba *hba,
              do_last_check = true;
          }
          spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
-    } while (tm_doorbell || tr_doorbell);
+    } while (tm_doorbell || tr_pending);
      if (timeout) {
          dev_err(hba->dev,
              "%s: timedout waiting for doorbell to clear (tm=0x%x, tr=0x%x)\n",
-            __func__, tm_doorbell, tr_doorbell);
+            __func__, tm_doorbell, tr_pending);
          ret = -EBUSY;
      }
  out:
@@ -2681,9 +2699,6 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
      WARN_ONCE(tag < 0, "Invalid tag %d\n", tag);
-    if (!down_read_trylock(&hba->clk_scaling_lock))
-        return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
-
      /*
       * Allows the UFS error handler to wait for prior ufshcd_queuecommand()
       * calls.
@@ -2772,8 +2787,6 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
  out:
      rcu_read_unlock();
-    up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
-
      if (ufs_trigger_eh()) {
          unsigned long flags;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 8e942762e668..88c20f3608c2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -778,6 +778,7 @@ struct ufs_hba_monitor {
   * @clk_list_head: UFS host controller clocks list node head
   * @pwr_info: holds current power mode
   * @max_pwr_info: keeps the device max valid pwm
+ * @clk_scaling_lock: used to serialize device commands and clock scaling
   * @desc_size: descriptor sizes reported by device
   * @urgent_bkops_lvl: keeps track of urgent bkops level for device
   * @is_urgent_bkops_lvl_checked: keeps track if the urgent bkops level for





--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux