On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 03:39:28PM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> This fixes the sparse warnings about t10_alua_tg_pt_gp accesses in
> target_core_spc.c from:
>
> commit 7324f47d4293 ("scsi: target: Replace lun_tg_pt_gp_lock with rcu in
> I/O path")
>
> That patch replaced the lun_tg_pt_gp_lock use in the IO path, but didn't
> update the INQUIRY code.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/target/target_core_spc.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
> index 22703a0dbd07..4c76498d3fb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
> @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ static void spc_fill_alua_data(struct se_lun *lun, unsigned char *buf)
> *
> * See spc4r17 section 6.4.2 Table 135
> */
> - spin_lock(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
> - tg_pt_gp = lun->lun_tg_pt_gp;
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + tg_pt_gp = rcu_dereference(lun->lun_tg_pt_gp);
> if (tg_pt_gp)
> buf[5] |= tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_alua_access_type;
> - spin_unlock(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> static u16
> @@ -325,14 +325,14 @@ spc_emulate_evpd_83(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *buf)
> * Get the PROTOCOL IDENTIFIER as defined by spc4r17
> * section 7.5.1 Table 362
> */
> - spin_lock(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
> - tg_pt_gp = lun->lun_tg_pt_gp;
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + tg_pt_gp = rcu_dereference(lun->lun_tg_pt_gp);
> if (!tg_pt_gp) {
> - spin_unlock(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> goto check_lu_gp;
> }
> tg_pt_gp_id = tg_pt_gp->tg_pt_gp_id;
> - spin_unlock(&lun->lun_tg_pt_gp_lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> buf[off] = tpg->proto_id << 4;
> buf[off++] |= 0x1; /* CODE SET == Binary */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Looks ok,
Reviewed-by: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@xxxxxxxxxx>
