Re: [PATCH] add help to WAIT_SCAN option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 02:50:14PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> This solution is still as wrong as it was the last three times it was
> submitted to linux-scsi:
> 
> http://marc.info/?t=117906989600001
> http://marc.info/?t=117926627700012
> http://marc.info/?t=117923062000004

ugh...sorry.  I should have looked first.

> A better, but still not quite right fix is here:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=117995785931981

Yes, I like this a lot better too.
But I'm failing to understanding why "late_initcall" isn't ok. 
I was expecting all drivers to have registered with scsi subsystem
in their module_init() calls and have the scans get kicked off
at that point. Further, I assumed "late_initcall" gets called
after "init" list is processed. What am I missing?

thanks,
grant
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux