On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 16:44 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Commit 7252a3603015 ("scsi: ufs: Avoid busy-waiting by eliminating
> tag
> conflicts") guarantees that 'tag' is not in use by any SCSI command.
> Remove the check that returns early if a conflict occurs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index dff76b1a0d5d..312e8a5b7733 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -6724,11 +6724,6 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct
> ufs_hba *hba,
> tag = req->tag;
> WARN_ONCE(tag < 0, "Invalid tag %d\n", tag);
>
> - if (unlikely(test_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs))) {
> - err = -EBUSY;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
> WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
> lrbp->cmd = NULL;
> @@ -6796,7 +6791,6 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct
> ufs_hba *hba,
> ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(hba, err ? UFS_QUERY_ERR :
> UFS_QUERY_COMP,
> (struct utp_upiu_req *)lrbp-
> >ucd_rsp_ptr);
>
> -out:
> blk_put_request(req);
Hi Bart,
Doesn't it need to be paired with blk_get_request()?
Kind regards,
Bean
> out_unlock:
> up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
