On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:11:34PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > In case of memory allocation failure, we should release many things and > should not return directly. > > The tricky part here, is that some (kzalloc + dma_pool_alloc) resources > are allocated and stored in 'unusable' and a 'good' list. > The 'good' list is then freed and only the 'unusable' list remains > allocated. > So, only this 'unusable' list is then freed in the error handling path of > the function. > > So, instead of adding even more code in this already huge function, just > 'continue' (as already done if dma_pool_alloc() fails) instead of > returning directly. > > After the 'for' loop, we will then branch to the correct place of the > error handling path when another memory allocation will (likely) fail > afterward. > > Fixes: 50b812755e97 ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix DMA error when the DIF sg buffer crosses 4GB boundary") > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Certainly not the best solution, but look 'safe' to me. Your analysis seems correct, but this is deeply weird. It sort of looks like this was debug code that was committed accidentally. Neither the "good" list nor the "unusable" are used except to print some debug info: ql_dbg_pci(ql_dbg_init, ha->pdev, 0x0024, "%s: dif dma pool (good=%u unusable=%u)\n", __func__, ha->pool.good.count, ha->pool.unusable.count); The good list is freed immediately, and then there is a no-op free in qla2x00_mem_free(). The unusable list is preserved until qla2x00_mem_free() but not used anywhere. regards, dan carpenter