On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 08:14 +0000, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > coccicheck complains about the use of snprintf() in sysfs show > functions: > WARNING use scnprintf or sprintf > > Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf, snprintf or sprintf makes more > sense. [] > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_attrs.c b/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_attrs.c [] > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ snic_show_state(struct device *dev, > { > struct snic *snic = shost_priv(class_to_shost(dev)); > > - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", > snic_state_str[snic_get_state(snic)]); > } when you do these, please consider the ability to rewrap to 80 columns. return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", snic_state_str[snic_get_state(snic)]); > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ snic_show_link_state(struct device *dev, > if (snic->config.xpt_type == SNIC_DAS) > snic->link_status = svnic_dev_link_status(snic->vdev); > > - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", > (snic->link_status) ? "Link Up" : "Link Down"); And maintain parenthesis alignment return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", snic->link_status ? "Link Up" : "Link Down"); or maybe return sysfs_emit(buf, "Link %s\n", snic->link_status ? "Up" : "Down");