I ACK the portion that resides in aacraid.h, and will track and push it in the future if it does not stick ;-> I will comment for any dpt_i2o, ips or aacraid patches posted to the SCSI list from submissions from folks not working at Adaptec once unit tested, accepted into the Adaptec upstreamed source or code inspected; as a matter of form. There will be no *requirement* to cc my maintainer address. Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn > -----Original Message----- > From: James Bottomley [mailto:James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 6:55 PM > To: Jeff Garzik > Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > Salyzyn, Mark; Andrew Vasquez > Subject: Re: [patch 14/25] SCSI: use irq_handler_t where appropriate > > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:07 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/scsi/aacraid/aacraid.h | 2 +- > > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_isr.c | 2 +- > > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > hrm. This appears to have been sent to linux-scsi at least > three times. > > > > If it doesn't stick, I'll go ahead and send it up myself. > > It's not a bug fix or even an enhancement. Historically, it is quite > difficult to get maintainers to ack these ... particularly if > you don't > cc them. > > James > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
