On 10/26/21 8:49 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 2021/10/27 11:38, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 10/26/21 8:22 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote: >>> From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Single LUN multi-actuator hard-disks are cappable to seek and execute >>> multiple commands in parallel. This capability is exposed to the host >>> using the Concurrent Positioning Ranges VPD page (SCSI) and Log (ATA). >>> Each positioning range describes the contiguous set of LBAs that an >>> actuator serves. >>> >>> This series adds support to the scsi disk driver to retreive this >>> information and advertize it to user space through sysfs. libata is >>> also modified to handle ATA drives. >>> >>> The first patch adds the block layer plumbing to expose concurrent >>> sector ranges of the device through sysfs as a sub-directory of the >>> device sysfs queue directory. Patch 2 and 3 add support to sd and >>> libata. Finally patch 4 documents the sysfs queue attributed changes. >>> Patch 5 fixes a typo in the document file (strictly speaking, not >>> related to this series). >>> >>> This series does not attempt in any way to optimize accesses to >>> multi-actuator devices (e.g. block IO schedulers or filesystems). This >>> initial support only exposes the independent access ranges information >>> to user space through sysfs. >> >> I've applied 1/9 for now, as that clearly belongs in the block tree. >> Might be the cleanest if SCSI does a post tree that depends on >> for-5.16/block. Or I can apply it all as they are reviewed. Let me >> know. > > Forgot: They are all reviewed, including Martin who sent a Reviewed-by for the > series, but not an Acked-by for patch 2. As for libata patch 3, obviously, this > is Acked-by me. Queued up 2-5 in the for-5.16/scsi-ma branch. -- Jens Axboe