Re: [patch 07/25] scsi: cover up bugs^W^W^WFix up compiler warnings in megaraid driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:52:40 -0500
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:41 -0700, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Martin Bligh <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Fix up compiler warnings in megaraid driver
> > 
> > [akpm@xxxxxxxx: build fix]
> > Signed-off-by: Martin J. Bligh <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/scsi/megaraid.c |   22 +++++++++++++---------
> >  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff -puN drivers/scsi/megaraid.c~scsi-cover-up-bugs-fix-up-compiler-warnings-in-megaraid-driver drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c~scsi-cover-up-bugs-fix-up-compiler-warnings-in-megaraid-driver
> > +++ a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
> > @@ -73,10 +73,14 @@ static unsigned short int max_mbox_busy_
> >  module_param(max_mbox_busy_wait, ushort, 0);
> >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_mbox_busy_wait, "Maximum wait for mailbox in microseconds if busy (default=MBOX_BUSY_WAIT=10)");
> >  
> > -#define RDINDOOR(adapter)	readl((adapter)->mmio_base + 0x20)
> > -#define RDOUTDOOR(adapter)	readl((adapter)->mmio_base + 0x2C)
> > -#define WRINDOOR(adapter,value)	 writel(value, (adapter)->mmio_base + 0x20)
> > -#define WROUTDOOR(adapter,value) writel(value, (adapter)->mmio_base + 0x2C)
> > +#define RDINDOOR(adapter)		readl((volatile void __iomem *) \
> > +							(adapter)->base + 0x20)
> > +#define RDOUTDOOR(adapter)		readl((volatile void __iomem *) \
> > +							(adapter)->base + 0x2C)
> > +#define WRINDOOR(adapter,value)		writel(value, (volatile void __iomem *)\
> > +							(adapter)->base + 0x20)
> > +#define WROUTDOOR(adapter,value)	writel(value, (volatile void __iomem *)\
> > +							(adapter)->base + 0x2C)
> 
> This is both unnecessary and wrong ... it coerces the iomem value and
> would squelch the useful warnings gcc would issue if base ever lost its
> iomem annotation.

hm, I removed that part and I'm still not getting any warnings.

Actually it looks wrong anyway - it replaced mio_base with base.

> >  /*
> >   * Global variables
> > @@ -3571,7 +3575,7 @@ megadev_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struc
> >  			/*
> >  			 * The user passthru structure
> >  			 */
> > -			upthru = (mega_passthru __user *)MBOX(uioc)->xferaddr;
> > +			upthru = (mega_passthru __user *)(unsigned long)MBOX(uioc)->xferaddr;
> >  
> >  			/*
> >  			 * Copy in the user passthru here.
> > @@ -3623,7 +3627,7 @@ megadev_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struc
> >  				/*
> >  				 * Get the user data
> >  				 */
> > -				if( copy_from_user(data, (char __user *)uxferaddr,
> > +				if( copy_from_user(data, (char __user *)(unsigned long) uxferaddr,
> >  							pthru->dataxferlen) ) {
> >  					rval = (-EFAULT);
> >  					goto freemem_and_return;
> > @@ -3649,7 +3653,7 @@ megadev_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struc
> >  			 * Is data going up-stream
> >  			 */
> >  			if( pthru->dataxferlen && (uioc.flags & UIOC_RD) ) {
> > -				if( copy_to_user((char __user *)uxferaddr, data,
> > +				if( copy_to_user((char __user *)(unsigned long) uxferaddr, data,
> >  							pthru->dataxferlen) ) {
> >  					rval = (-EFAULT);
> >  				}
> > @@ -3702,7 +3706,7 @@ freemem_and_return:
> >  				/*
> >  				 * Get the user data
> >  				 */
> > -				if( copy_from_user(data, (char __user *)uxferaddr,
> > +				if( copy_from_user(data, (char __user *)(unsigned long) uxferaddr,
> >  							uioc.xferlen) ) {
> >  
> >  					pci_free_consistent(pdev,
> > @@ -3742,7 +3746,7 @@ freemem_and_return:
> >  			 * Is data going up-stream
> >  			 */
> >  			if( uioc.xferlen && (uioc.flags & UIOC_RD) ) {
> > -				if( copy_to_user((char __user *)uxferaddr, data,
> > +				if( copy_to_user((char __user *)(unsigned long) uxferaddr, data,
> >  							uioc.xferlen) ) {
> >  
> >  					rval = (-EFAULT);
> 
> This lot, I think are all OK.  The mbox descriptor can only handle 32
> bits.  However, the mbox itself is in PCI consistent memory, which, by
> definition on all platforms is in the first 4GB unless you raise the
> consistent dma mask.  If that's true, it's not covering up anything
> other than a spurious compiler error.

yup.

> Would be nice to get an ack from the maintainer to this, though.

Well, it's been floating around since December and the maintainer is
obviously dead.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux