Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mark HPB support as BROKEN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021/10/26 16:12, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The HPB support added this merge window is fundanetally flawed as it
> uses blk_insert_cloned_request to insert a cloned request onto the same
> queue as the one that the original request came from, leading to all
> kinds of issues in blk-mq accounting (in addition to this API being
> a special case for dm-mpath that should not see other users).
> 
> Mark is as BROKEN as the non-intrusive alternative to a last minute

s/Mark is/Mark it

> large scale revert.
> 
> Fixes: f02bc9754a68 ("scsi: ufs: ufshpb: Introduce Host Performance Buffer
> feature")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> index 432df76e6318a..7835d9082aae4 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ config SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO
>  
>  config SCSI_UFS_HPB
>  	bool "Support UFS Host Performance Booster"
> -	depends on SCSI_UFSHCD
> +	depends on SCSI_UFSHCD && BROKEN
>  	help
>  	  The UFS HPB feature improves random read performance. It caches
>  	  L2P (logical to physical) map of UFS to host DRAM. The driver uses HPB
> 

Otherwise, looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux