Re: please revert the UFS HPB support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Christoph,

> I just noticed the UFS HPB support landed in 5.15, and just as before
> it is completely broken by allocating another request on the same
> device and then reinserting it in the queue.  It is bad enough that we
> have to live with blk_insert_cloned_request for dm-mpath, but this is
> too big of an API abuse to make it into a release.  We need to drop
> this code ASAP, and I can prepare a patch for that.

The series went through 40 iterations on the list prior to being merged.
I don't recall a better approach to reconcile the HPB model with the
stack being offered during that process?

As much as I don't like HPB, all the major UFS subsystem stakeholders
are behind it. The hardware is shipping and various device stacks
already adopted support for it. At this stage I don't think dropping the
code is a way forward. I am much more in favor of having a productive
discussion about how to go about addressing the problems with the
queuing model...

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux