[PATCH 3/3] dm: don't stop request queue after the dm device is suspended

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For fixing queue quiesce race between driver and block layer(elevator
switch, update nr_requests, ...), we need to support concurrent quiesce
and unquiesce, which requires the two call to be balanced.

__bind() is only called from dm_swap_table() in which dm device has been
suspended already, so not necessary to stop queue again. With this way,
request queue quiesce and unquiesce can be balanced.

Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: e70feb8b3e68 ("blk-mq: support concurrent queue quiesce/unquiesce")
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/md/dm.c | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index 7870e6460633..727282d79b26 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1927,16 +1927,6 @@ static struct dm_table *__bind(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *t,
 
 	dm_table_event_callback(t, event_callback, md);
 
-	/*
-	 * The queue hasn't been stopped yet, if the old table type wasn't
-	 * for request-based during suspension.  So stop it to prevent
-	 * I/O mapping before resume.
-	 * This must be done before setting the queue restrictions,
-	 * because request-based dm may be run just after the setting.
-	 */
-	if (request_based)
-		dm_stop_queue(q);
-
 	if (request_based) {
 		/*
 		 * Leverage the fact that request-based DM targets are
-- 
2.31.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux